Shame on Karen Armstrong!

Print the article

This entry was posted on 8/24/2006 4:16 PM and is filed under Madness.

Whom, you may ask, is Karen Armstrong? Even a cursory web search immediately reveals that she is a "prolific scholar of religions" who has written on a multitude of faiths. Says Armstrong...

"I usually describe myself, perhaps flippantly, as a freelance monotheist. I draw sustenance from all three of the faiths of Abraham. I can't see any one of them as having the monopoly of truth, any one of them as superior to any of the others."

I must make a note to revisit the meaning of "scholar" if I hope to understand this woman's appeal because she is, especially with regard to Islam, spectacularly wrong. Now, I'll confess to harboring a portion of passive ill-will for her (as men often do toward women who've made them look the fool). No, we never dated, but I, like millions of the equally gullible, read her international best-seller A History of God and bought the full package. The work is called "
stunningly intelligent" and she "one of the most provocative original thinkers on the role of religion in the modern world." Embarrassingly, I held her work in the same light and soon, so enlightened by Armstrong's insight, became an apologist for Islam based on what I had "learned."

But the facts once examined shout,
Karen, you are either mentally challenged, incompetent, or have an agenda beyond human understanding. Anyone who knows anything about the Qur'an, dhimmitude, Islam's barbarous history or women's rights under Islam would conclude that your defense of the faith is no better than dangerously misleading. But you are obviously intelligent and ostensibly competent so we are left to conclude that you have an agenda; a personal one, we suspect, not intentionally destructive and yet who cares? The pablum you spread about Islam, because of its massive appeal and distorted content, imposes a disservice upon the entire, threatened, non-Islamic world.

And for this I say, Karen Armstrong, shame on you.

Those interested in an examination of Ms. Armstrong's fuzzy thinking may read
this critique of Islam: A Short History.

Also consider
this

Finally, Satyameva Jayate, a Hindu who, though he (or she?) may lack Ms. Armstrong's fame and scholarship has composed a much more informed (though infinitely less politically correct) take on Islam. Says Jayate:

Islam imposes a threat to the whole world which is far worse than deforestation, nuclear destruction or AIDS. It is an insidious, devilish disease creeping into the veins of the world. Every individual must realize the destructive and evil nature of this religion, for it eats away at the very foundation of humanity which is an individual's ability to think individually and act accordingly.

Read several articles expanding upon the above here and decide for yourself what Jayate must think of Ms. Armstrong's scholarship which for all intents and purposes seems to constitute a conscious, conscienceless and purposeful fraud—a laughable fraud if not so well-accepted and so threatening in its naiveté.


Many Muslims (and Karen Armstrong) would respond to Jayate's criticism by pointing to similar distortions of Christianity--the Crusades for example—and equate violence in the name of Christianity with similarly "distortions" of the Muslim faith. Not so. The examples of "Christian violence" cannot be supported by verses in the new testament. The term is an oxymoron. But virtually all of the violence perpetrated throughout history to the present in the name of Islam can be justified by direct, unequivocal instruction in the Qur'an. Ms. Armstrong is a scholar and must know as much but has chosen to turn a blind eye.

Keep in mind it's not easy to find anything critical of Ms. Armstrong or her work. Inexplicably, the world adores her. Google her name and you will find endless reviews and commentary bordering on exaltation but I promise, read A History of God, study the Qur'an even half-heartedly and keep an open mind to the thoughts of competent critics of Islam and you can only conclude that the world, in the case of Karen Armstrong, is an ass.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.